Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALIQ-UR-REHMAN versus SECRETARY HOUSING URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLICHEALTH ENGINEERING

RR 4 (1) (b) (i), 5, 6 and 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Implementation of the major penalties for reduction of constitutional rank served as Deputy Director FATA of Inquiry Officer PTI. Transfering officer, action was taken. Against the departmental proceedings and thereafter, the defendant was appointed inquiry officer to give the applicant a personal hearing. The order of the respondent of the competent authority was again appointed as inquiry officer and the applicant objected to his appointment on the basis that he had expressed his mind in the earlier department proceedings, Did not expect a free and fair trial by respondent. This respect was rejected, the petitioner filed a constitutional petition in the absence of any legal compulsion to reject, the defendant again inquired if the applicant expressed his dissatisfaction as a applicant. Should not have been appointed as an officer, the premise may not be good, but in the case of the appointment of an inquiry officer as the defendant inquiry officer. The applicant was against the principle that justice should not only be done, but it should also be clear that the trust of a person or a party or arbitrator in the proceedings was the first step towards a free and fair trial of the respondent, in this case. As an Inquiry Officer, I was already aware of a number of facts that led to the applicant being found guilty of misconduct; it is likely that he was subjected to preliminary conclusions for basic and preliminary responses to justice, Equity best advocate from Gadoon Amazai lawyer