Find a Lawyer

DR. AKMAL WAHEED versus STATE

Sections 201, 212, 216 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the definition of Section 21J charges, which were doctors, were declared a crime and due to the disappearance of evidence of crime, and to escape detention. Accused of providing asylum to the accused The suspects were that they provided medical treatment and arrested a person involved in a crime, the prosecutor relied on the evidence of a witness who was declared honorable and the evidence was based on a piece of evidence. Without that, it was not enough to prove the allegation. Against the charge that he gave false information to the screening offender, the prosecutor's case was restored to the charge that the accused needed prosecution because of missing evidence from the commission regarding the crime. It may be that the accused knew that the crime had been committed and that the crime was in evidence. Disappeared by them, but the prosecution did not present any evidence to show that the evidence collected by the prosecutor stated that in Part I, the main components of the PPC disappeared. The accused, under whom the accused was convicted, were not attracted to the matter, the Special Prosecutor acknowledged that the provisions of section 216, PPC in the prosecution in this case were also not applicable. Are. Failure to produce any evidence to prove the alleged asylum of the accused involved in the crime, if an attempt is being made to prosecute the accused, confession against the accused can be used and the same offense. Doctors / accused persons were not prosecuted in connection with the case. Confession of crime famous high court advocate from Abbaspur lawyer