Find a Lawyer

PRESIDENT DBA, MIRPUR KHAS versus AMANULLAH SOOMRO, ADVOCATE

Section 41 (1) The prosecution proceedings against the Advocate were initially initiated by the Sindh Bar Council Dispensary Committee on the complaint of the Vice President of the Bar Association, which the relevant lawyer was not practicing as an advocate and he The stamp was busy with the vendor's work. Notary Public; it said that lawyers have always been accused of speaking and using non-parliamentary language against lawyers and against lower and higher judicial judges. That because of his activities, the District Bar Association had canceled his membership and his name was removed from the District Bar role. And that the General Body Meeting of the District Bar Association had unanimously decided to file a complaint for disciplinary proceedings against the lawyer in the Sindh Bar Council for the reason for which. The disciplinary committee took notice of the matter and issued notice to it. The lawyer, but despite the service, did not appear to have any conflicts or contentions against the claims made against him, the Dispensary Committee found the lawyer guilty of professional misconduct and prosecuted the case against the Advocate. Sent to the tribunal for hearing and action. The service disappeared despite the fact that, without excessive documentation and verbal evidence to support the complaint, without any challenge and obstruction, speculation, in the circumstances, would have led to the complaint and case being prosecuted against the accused and The charge against is considered a reference by the Dispensary. The Committee allowed a relevant lawyer to be removed from the practice and immediately registration advocate from Shahdad Pur lawyer