Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus MUHAMMAD NAEEM

O XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 Special Relief Act (of 1877), section 12 suit which failed to perform its part in the contract and the specific performance of the contract to sell the land to the occupier with the matter. Was demonstrated because it was not delivered to the claimant. According to the agreement, after the receipt of the huge sum, the plaintiff also filed an application with the claimant under O XXXXX, RR 1 & 2, CPC, and in any way against the defendant separating the property in any way. Prayed for a restraining order against the ban. The claimant is upset with the approval of the petition and has filed an appeal with the claim that he is the owner, so the land cannot be banned separately and that without the need to submit a balanced sale price to the claimant / applicants. The order could not be issued, the plaintiff acknowledges the implementation and the receipt of a fixed amount of Rs 2750,000, instead of emphasizing the inadequate nature of the settlement and seller agreement. , 50,00,000 terms of the agreement on the basis of which the defendants filed a specific performance case, the defendants also did not deny where it was agreed that the actual physical possession of the land was handed over to the plaintiffs. And they will pay the additional amount of Rs.1,00,000 as per the agreement, according to the agreement, when the claimants paid the settled amount of Rs. It is alleged that the plaintiff has disclosed. Some of the housing schemes were in agreement with the land development contract and they were to pay some portion of the sale consideration after the development of the land, which they occupied. advocates from Kacha Khooh lawyer