IN THE MATTER OF: MUHAMMAD BILAL KHAN AND ANOTHER versus IN THE MATTER OF: MUHAMMAD BILAL KHAN AND ANOTHER
Section 18 Offers Multiple Requests for the Purchase of Shares A list of all applicant cases, which found that the Securities and Exchange Ordinance, filed a petition in violation of Section 18A of 1969, the Commission And submitted in the name of the applicants. In the list of multiple applicants, one application was submitted by one bank and the other application was submitted by the same bank to different city, both applications were submitted by the same NIC number, but different In response to the applicant's name and signatures of the father under the names, for written explanation, he stated that he had submitted only one application and that he had no knowledge of any other application submitted to the Commission. Who asked for a written explanation from the other person whose name was mentioned in the second request said the other person is present He further admitted that he had tampered with the NIC's photocopy of the original applicant and that he himself used to file another application; he added that the original applicant was innocent and his Was completely unaware of the process and was told that the shares were allotted that the original applicant's request was submitted by two different persons who used the same NIC number, but with different names. Also, the original application submitted by the applicant's names, addresses and signatures was given to the real authority that the applicant The application submitted by H should be accepted and allotments will be made with his name. The other person applied for the applicants
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Tando Allahyar lawyer