Find a Lawyer

HAMMAD ARSHAD versus NFC INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGICAL TRAINING KHANEWAL ROAD, MULTAN, THROUGH DIRECTOR

The applicant for the return of admission fee under the Self Finance Scheme, who was offered a seat under the Self Finance Scheme, accepted the same and the deposit amount to get admission under the Scheme Petitioner. , Did not attend the class and wrote a letter for the refund of the deposit. On the basis that he was not able to go on with his studies due to family problems and was enrolled at another university, he returned to the applicant for a refund from a different place. The position was not permanent as it started leaving the institute for refund by the applicant, his education at various universities was proved wrong at various places even if otherwise admitted under the self finance scheme. Applicant changes his / her mind after submitting the deposit due to personal reasons. They were not involved, the authorities could not be faulted for returning the liabilities after admitting themselves to self-finance and could be fined. It was mentioned that the amount under consideration would not be refunded and the petitioner stated that the prospectus was bound by the terms and conditions of the petitioner, in the circumstances, his own misconduct could not be taken as he himself was. Responsible for not attending the classes and the authorities were not at fault. The money in question could not be refunded as the university / institute was not recognized by the Pakistan Engineering Council which on the one hand was a realistic one. power of attorney advocate Tharparkar lawyer