Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 324, 353, 392 and 397 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), definition of section 231 evidence are beyond doubt on record. The accused was the person who snatched the SMG rifle from the prosecution witness and the person identified in the identification test was correctly identified, all the prosecution witnesses were thoroughly examined by the prosecutor, Nothing came on the record to defame the evidence of They did not agree on the points of their evidence, nor was there any contradiction or contradiction in their evidence, nor was any such contradiction or contradiction identified by the accused's lawyer, and the presence of witnesses in the judicial examination. The accused did not challenge, the evidence of the prosecution's testimony which was fully supported and supported by the evidence of the circumstances, was natural and reasonable in the circumstances of the case, for no reason in these cases, their statements The prosecution had set a case against the accused for completion, beyond any reasonable doubt that the accused had said that after the modification of the charge, the witness They were not re-examined, Section 231, CRPC's provisions were violated and the matter should have been remanded. After being accused of accuracy, it was alleged that he did not request the court to call back the witnesses, there was nothing illegal in the trial. The accused was stopped. The trial was stopped in a planned manner. This has happened and this has led to terrorism in the police department. The trial court gave evidence to the accused regarding mental health of the accused divorce advocates from Mian Walli lawyer