Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KISMAT ALI versus ABDUL KADER


Pakistan Penal Code Section 408 should not impose simultaneous imprisonment and fine unless it is legitimate, unless it is necessary in the interest of justice.

PLD 1952 Dacca 266

Before Amin Ahmed and Ibrahim, JJ

KISMAT ALI‑Accused‑Petitioner

Versus

ABDUL KADER‑Complainant‑Opposite‑Party

Criminal Revision No. 421 of 1951, decided on 24th July 1951.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

, S. 408‑Simultaneous sen tences of imprisonment and fine though permissible should not be inflicted, unless necessary in interest of justice.

Though it is permissible under section 408 of the Pakistan P. C. to inflict sentence of fine simultaneously with the sub stantive sentence of imprisonment, ordinarily the double sentence should not be inflicted unless necessary in the interest of justice.

Islam and another v. King Emperor 35 C W N 519 ref.

Maksum‑ul‑Hakim, for K. Hossain for Petitioner.

Nemo for the Crown.

JUDGMENT

IBRAHIM, J.‑

---This rule was issued on the ground of sentence only. The petitioner is the gomosta of the complainant. He was entrusted with cash of Rs. 1,500 for purchase of paddy in the district of Sylhet. After the money was paid the petitioner proceeded to Shamserganj with a boat but he left the boat at Bhairab on the plea that he would go to Shamser ganj by Railway train and directed the boatman to go to Shamserganj. He, however, did not go there. The boatman ultimately returned and reported the whole thing to the complainant. The petitioner was, thereafter, repeatedly asked to return the money but he did not return it. On these facts he was convicted under section 408 of the Pakistan P. C. and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and a fine of Rs. 500 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for another period of six months.

Though it is permissible under section 408 of the Pakistan P. C. to inflict sentence of fine simultaneously with the sub stantive sentence of imprisonment, ordinarily the double sentence should not be inflicted unless necessary in the interest of justice. The learned counsel has also referred to the case of Islam and another v. King Emperor 35 C W N 519. The learned Magistrate did not award any compensation to the complainant in this case.

We do not think, in the circumstances, that there should be double sentence and accordingly we set aside the sentence of fine but uphold the conviction and sentence of imprison ment under section 408 of the Pakistan P. C. The fine should be refunded, if already paid. He will now surrender to his bail bond and serve out the remainder of sentence imposed upon him.

The rule is made absolute in these terms.

AMIN AHMED, J.

‑---I agree.

A.H. Rule made absolute.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Padidan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.