CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI versus AMMAR HOUSING SERVICES (PVT.) LIMITED
Section 12 (2) of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 passed the collective court challenging the appellant's allegations of fraud and misrepresentation under section 12 (2) in favor of the defendant. Appeals challenging the interpretation of the agreement. And the misrepresentation stated that the application was dismissed, the appellant filed a High Court appeal, despite knowing that the lease for the disputed property in his favor was canceled and he did not pay the lease amount. Was struggling to obtain disputed property, which was nothing, but the fact that he was hiding in the courts is a person's basic right to protest a legitimate complaint, while the term ` Fraudulent the intends to deprive property through the veil of this fact, a continuous process of such misrepresentation will appear. Rather, to prove an unlawful advantage to a person who was presently dishonest, the defendant behaved dishonestly by obtaining an injunction in his favor, establishing a title for himself, and further fraud was established by him. In pursuance of the order, his act of perpetual misrepresentation before the court respondent was leased by Nazir. The court's respondents' conduct was the definitive evidence of fraud committed by them in the courts.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
