DOST MUHAMMAD versus GHULAM NOOR (DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS
Sections 5, 2 (c), (d) and (d) (iii) The nature of the suit transaction for the former settlement was a question of whether the matter was sold in the matter or the statements of the defendant's witnesses were exchanged. It has been reported that they only see the sales transition. Things were not discussed and discussed in his presence, nor was Barani accepted in the controversial nature of the promotion of the sale (121 Kanal) while the property in turn was given (38 Kanal, 17). Marla) was a canal and since the cost of both is almost the same, the defendant's version supports that the transaction was \ r \ nin the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
