Find a Lawyer

SYED ANSAR HUSSAIN versus KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD KALEEM

Evidence of fraudulent transactions under the influence of the Section & Cross 42 cross-suit by the courts below the deceased fact-based discoveries sought to take possession of the house under question on the grounds that their deceased son was owned by the defendants. That they are the real owners of the disputed house. And asserted that the plaintiff's son was a defendant defend The defendant's only viable dispute was that the suithouse was actually purchased by a partner company in which the deceased was one of the partners and the suithouse was occupied by the defendant and the original documents. Had It was also submitted that the suit filed by the plaintiff was rejected and the judgment passed by the title court to the defendants approved by the title court by the title court and by the plaintiff. The order submitted by the appellate court was maintained that the defendants had neither produced the record of the firm nor any witnesses from whom it could be established that the house was purchased by the firm, Valdetti Onal. That as a partner of the firm, the house was taken over by the plaintiff's son, after his death. , Including the acquisition of title documents, would not mean that the property was purchased, that the important components of the firm's motive and source of the anonymous transaction were evidence of which was lost in the matter of which Such an aspect was neglected by the lower courts, consequently their decisions and orders could not be sustained. If the decree passed in the case against the plaintiff was set aside, the other case filed by the plaintiff will be dismissed. best law firm from Khangah Sharif lawyer