MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus LAL DIN
Section 12 (2) and AXXIII, R 3 Based on the statements of the parties in the presence of their counsel, the non-challenged decree before the appellate / resettlement court to file two successive petitions for rejecting such order. ? The application taken by the first applicant's son and the second by the self-applicant itself was different, and the contradictory applicant in both the applicants did not deny his statement and his thumb that the court did not apply to the applicant in his application. Received and submitted to the Inquiry. Account, but did not specify who opened the account in bank fraud and misrepresentation was not established by the applicants \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Sherani lawyer