Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNIS versus SHAHID CHEEMA

Sections 3 and 5 (1) the Sessions Court dismissed the complaint filed by the applicant under Section 3 of the Unlawful Settlement Act 2005, which, under a brief improper order, the competent complainant made a special charge that The defendant had bought only 4 kanals and 5 marshals of land, but more than his right, he had taken possession of the 7 kanals and 15 mars of land owned by the complainant court for filing a complaint under the Illegal Settlement Act, 2005. The matter had to be referred to the relevant Section H. The matter was not investigated after receiving an inquiry and such report and proceeding with Section HA, but only partially commenting on a private complaint with an ambiguous report, saying The police were not able to intervene in the matter. The Sessions Court dismissed the matter for the proper investigation under Section 5 (1) of the said Act, rather than re-passing it to Section HO. Complained summarily without referring to a document and thus failing to exercise its proper jurisdiction The impeachment order was held not to be lawful and according to the lawsuit The sessions court was remanded for this decision. Illegal Settlement Act, 2005 Pakistan, top advocate family court from Talamba lawyer