Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY, EDUCATION (SCHOOLS), GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR, EX HEADMASTER

RR 2 (1), 3 and 4 Pension Rules, 1969, R1 8 Powers Rules Rules, 1990, R 3 (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Headmaster misappropriation of funds. Upon receipt, the Charge Service Tribunal did not accuse the headmaster of the misuse or misconduct against a civil servant in the charge sheet, but alleges an unlawful refund of money spent on the purchase of cocaine observation items. Is to blame The allegations and charges should be of a particular nature in which they could provide the appropriate explanation to the honorable officer, proper approval was given for illegal purchases; the headmaster was instructed by the director, education, to issue payment to the contractor when approved. A letter of cancellation was received when various items of payment bill were already made. The purchased item was physically available and was mentioned in the relevant purchase. Circular letter from the Treasury Department as per C-Registered Headmaster 1, 1986. No. FD was able to bear up to 300,000 R under 5/82, explained the nature of the charge And certain procedures followed were without a dozen joint inquiry principals. , Which resulted in a serious miscarriage of the Justice Department that it had initiated disciplinary proceedings against the Headmaster a year after his retirement. pakistani advocates Upper Deval lawyer