Find a Lawyer

MAJ. (RETD.) IJAZ-UL-HAQ versus TARIQ NAZIR BUTT

Cancellation of Section 497 (5) Copyright Ordinance (XXXIV of 1962), Sections 66 and 57 Pre-arrest Guarantees, When an offense is committed under Section 66 of the Copyright Ordinance, 1962, they must have the legal right Is. Worked with the knowledge that the product was protected by copyright and was not authorized to sell a single copy of the novel to the police when the defendant purchased the first item from the store to produce the first item. Was not enough for them. The trial will be decided by the trial court after recording the evidence of the parties to Section 67 of the Copyright Ordinance, 1962 was also not attracted because the police had no material to show. Did not export that the book was printed. The accused challan, after the completion of the investigation, was produced in court, which he confessed to, and sending the accused to jail would not be beneficial for prosecution for any legal proceedings. y Development of Investigation The maximum sentence for a crime was three years. The approval of the bail in RI and such cases was a rule and the refusal was exempt and the complainant was not involved in such a case. He was charged with false implications, but there may have been a confrontation between them on business terms, alleging that he did not misuse the privilege of guaranteeing arrest in any way, he was dismissed under the circumstances. Was. r \ n \ r \ n lawer from fb area from Chak Sheza lawyer