MST. ZAREENA BIBI versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF
The Twelfth, Article 1 and 2 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 List of Documents Included with the Constitutional Requests In the objection not to mention any document in the list, the respondent relied on the agreement, which was filed by him. The documents filed were not mentioned in the list. In addition to his written statement, the trial court refused to accept the agreement as documentary evidence, but the appellate court allowed it to be taken as documentary evidence on the basis that O XIII, Rr. The rationale behind the provisions of 1 and 2 was rationality. The CPC was that no one should be taken by surprise and there should be transparency in the process that litigation was a necessary document and it was mentioned in a written statement by the defendant. So it wouldn't be included in the list. Seventh-twelfth, provisions of RR 1 and 2, CPC, defendants were already fined with costs The delay in the case was sufficiently fine The URL refused to interfere with the order passed by the Appellate Court Which was excluded under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Rangoo lawyer