DISTRICT COUNCIL, FAISALABAD versus CH. MUHAMMAD YASIN
Sections 4 and 5 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Deletion of Delay of Section 100 Second Appeal The second appeal filed by government officials was banned for 397 days. The plea was postponed to the end of the court fee. No funding available for purchase. , The Appellant's name was ambiguous and the High Court was closed due to the summer vacation, on the last day of filing the Appeal Appeal, the funds were available to the authorities for the purchase of court fees and there was no problem with the funds about the name. Was. During the summer holidays, the issue of filing an appeal was resolved; the office of the High Court was open for recreational matters, thus the protection of Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1908 was not available to the appellant / department. Even if there was a problem inside. The Department of Appeals cannot be delayed to justify such delays which were not sufficient and did not justify depriving the respondents of the valuable rights which the Department periodically imposed upon them. The government departments could not be given any preferential treatment because under private legal cases the department failed to explain the extraordinary delay caused by its negligence / sanctions. It was certified after two months without cause. Apply for copies then file an appeal after obtaining copies from the copying agency. Lost more than a year
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Saidu Sharif lawyer