Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus MUHAMMAD NAZIR

Section 2 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XXXXX, Joint Measures Transitional Order The suit for division of the defendant claimed that he was the co-owner of the property in dispute and that its nature could not be changed without division. ? In order to infringe their rights, the defendants claimed that they had disputed the plaintiff's title and, being the sole proprietor, had given them a portion of the property on the part of the property for the relevant year. I have the right to do the construction, before the fax indicated that the claimant is a partner. Any change in property disputed in a disputed disputed number of disputes may, in the circumstances, damage the rights of the plaintiff in respect of its distribution if the defendants have any right to take up any construction on the property in dispute over their ownership. If they feel the need, they can do so at their own risk and cost. Any construction taken by the defendants after the suit will not in any way prejudice the rights of the plaintiff. Of famous supreme court advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer