Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SOOMAR KHAN versus STATE


Sections 200 and 439 Direct Complaint Initial Inquiry Sessions Judge sent a direct complaint against Section HO to the relevant Magistrate for the preliminary inquiry, the Magistrate submitted a report to the Sessions Judge after the inquiry that brought a case for registration in this case. Was gone, but the session judge adopted a contentious view and, rejecting the direct complaint, the complainant filed a review against the order of the Sessions Judge's accuracy at the preliminary investigation stage, to see that the evidence on record , The case was registered, in the report for registration, in the present case, it has been shown that r Enough evidence was brought on the card, which was filed by the first party to sue, challenging the order's review that the reasons for rejecting the magistrate's search for the preliminary inquiry were not provided. ? Things could not be sustained should the lawsuit be filed with the results of the preliminary investigation

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Sargodha lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.