SOOMAR KHAN versus STATE
Sections 200 and 439 Direct Complaint Initial Inquiry Sessions Judge sent a direct complaint against Section HO to the relevant Magistrate for the preliminary inquiry, the Magistrate submitted a report to the Sessions Judge after the inquiry that brought a case for registration in this case. Was gone, but the session judge adopted a contentious view and, rejecting the direct complaint, the complainant filed a review against the order of the Sessions Judge's accuracy at the preliminary investigation stage, to see that the evidence on record , The case was registered, in the report for registration, in the present case, it has been shown that r Enough evidence was brought on the card, which was filed by the first party to sue, challenging the order's review that the reasons for rejecting the magistrate's search for the preliminary inquiry were not provided. ? Things could not be sustained should the lawsuit be filed with the results of the preliminary investigation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Sargodha lawyer