Find a Lawyer

KHALID AHMED KHAN versus MALIK RAFI PRIVATE LTD.

RR 8 (IV) and A (1) and A (2) Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act (XLI of 1997), section 33 were charged with penalties for negligence and negligence in business. They are dealing with the matter. Company through someone who was the agent of the company: and that their accounts were misused and as a result they suffered huge losses. The company said that this person was not the agent of the company, but merely its user and that he was not responsible for any damage to the complainants allegedly by the director of the company commission. To find out that this person is an agent of the company, it has also been found that the actions taken by the aforesaid person are outside the scope of his work and that the company was not responsible, as the director of the commission for his actions Has imposed a fine of Rs. 50,000 on each complaint under R8 (IV) read with Rules A (1) and A (2) of the Rules of Registration of Brokers and Agents 2001. What was In a complaint for L's wisdom and neglect in business matters, all parties filed relevant appeals against the complainant's director's decision to argue that on the one hand, the director of the commission found that the person was one. The agent of the company, on the other hand, found himself inconsistent with the unauthorized verdict on the verification of the company and then directed the complainants to seek a settlement with the civil court. Also, it There was a complex case that was not properly investigated in the investigation. Under the circumstances, the securities market division is remanded along this direction law firms from Hattian lawyer