GHULAM AHMED versus STATE
Section 497 Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 17 and 22 Prevention and Control of Human Trafficking Ordinance (LIX of 2002), Section 3 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), 5 489f bail, refusal of serious charges Was imposed. It did not refuse to issue a check in favor of the complainant, who allegedly denied the filing of a civil suit by the accused in connection with the cancellation of some documents, alleging that it was forcibly obtained, first , His case was a tool to make one. At the age of 60, the further inquiry was not sufficient to release him on bail when he was involved in an offense under the Prohibited Clause of Section 497 (1), similarly against the CRPC. Several other inquiries were in progress. The accused challan had already been produced in the trial court, court bail was denied in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Adda Jahan Khan lawyer