Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus STATE

The testimony of section 302 (b) and 34 evidence appreciation was started about 36 days after the alleged incident, which was the victim's sister, lived 15 miles from the location of the incident when the incident took place. The complainant's presence could not be ascertained. He was confronted in court when he was in the field of jawar, where there was a contradiction in light of the lightning even though otherwise the maize field could be prevented by lightning. The content was full of contradictions. The points were dismissed by the trial court and the co-accused considered the fate of the accused suspects, but the trial court should have made the same argument in the case of the accused and the accused had a similar role. Was declared as a result of the blow of the dagger. The body of the accused was alleged to have suffered injuries to his chest, abdomen and right to left. Such injuries were not easily attributed to him. The witnesses were the same. The only difference was that the recovery of the dagger was only charged on the accused, which was extended to the co-accused, that the accused should be given the same benefit, the suspect was given the benefit of the doubt, his punishment and The sentence was set aside and he was honored. All the charges against him were and were released immigration advocates email from Kohlu lawyer