ELLAHI BAKHSH versus AHMAD BAKHSH
Proof of Sale of Land Registration in Revenue Record for Declaration of Change in Section Q 53 of the Contempt of Evidence (of 10 of 1984), Arts 1 18 and 120 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), all 42, all The vendor recorded in the altercation was a relative of Patwari who entered and entered the dispute and eventually came into possession of the aforesaid Patwari when the transaction was challenged by mutation, to establish such existence and validity. Proof is proof of this to the beneficiary of such variation. The transaction failed to prove to the defendants that the sale was considered, neither the original variations nor the daily magazines were presented, even the good and surviving seller was not presented in the witness box, legitimate sale. In the absence of any component of, the lower appellate court erroneously overlooked the land. The above changes were legitimately eliminated
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Sahiwal lawyer