Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAMDY NAZIR versus MUHAMMAD ARIF

Sections 11 and 96 (3) were the property and the cause of action was the same in both the fresh and the previous cases The previous suit was compromised 13 years after the decision of the previous suit on the basis of the agreement, the applicable agreement based on the agreement. The principle of the law was not significant among the parties under the law, thus, the effect of filing a fresh suit cannot be ruled out nor can it be dismissed. The Fresh Suit was forbidden over time and could not only be filed due to the implementation of the Res Judeta Rule, but the claimant would be stopped and the same fresh suit was prevented from being instituted. best advocate from Shahdad Pur lawyer