KARACHI STOCK EXCHANGE THROUGH ATTORNEY versus MUHAMMAD ASHAQEEN
Sections 45 (4) and (5) (ii) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O XXXX, R1 and 2 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Interim Order of the Section 3 High Court, Public Transfer Approval / Plots of convenience in residential / commercial plots, legality of suit and declaration of immunity by appellants in favor of the respondent to be used by the applicants as the building of the plaintiff and the construction of the residential building. Challenged the grant / lease of In order to prevent appellants from taking any constructions on the said plot for interim injunction, the High Court (Single Judge) rejected the High Court (Single Judge) saying that the existence of only the first case, balance of convenience and It was considered irreparable harm while rejecting the order but had to show good faith and persistence, and since the case was filed so late, the remittance was delayed. Therefore, appropriate relief could not be found under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
