Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS AND OTHERS versus STATE

Article 391, 396, 395, 458, 458/114 and 412 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The contention was that in accordance with the provisions of section 391, PPC read with section 396, PPC accused. They deserved the same punishment, as they were all equally responsible for the commission of the crime, and as the High Court reduced the death sentence to the death sentence of another co-accused, however the accused Was not responsible for maintaining his death sentence, however, at that stage when the accused's lawyer was seen relying on the law, the Supreme Court's first ?? rm was to consider if the death sentence of the accused was tolerable. If pending, the remaining accused will also be responsible for the death sentence, while notices were also issued on leave to appeal in the case of the accused, so as to explain why their convictions should not be increased as well. What can be done, therefore, to examine the aforesaid convictions, the appeal was granted. As to the merits of the case to the extent of other accused persons property advocate from Killa Abdullah lawyer