Find a Lawyer

MIRZA LUTUF MUHAMMAD KHAN, CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER/FREIGHT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Sections 8 and 9 constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 Constitution promotion r \ nA petition of the seniority and publicity petitioner, who was the officer of BS 19, filed a constitutional petition against his resignation on this basis in 2001 and again in 2003. Was Overall a score of 70, but was considered invalid due to irrational reasons for supplying the applicant given at the Central Selection Board meeting held in 2003 as irrelevant. And the complete facts regarding the applicants' performance evaluation reports for 2001 were not reported to the Central Selection Board. The obstacle to the applicant was that the ACR for the year 2000 was yet to be completed while its 2001 report was yet to be countered and the applicant's performance review report was not completed in 2001. The defendants' authority was the default. Even when the applicant was being represented before the competent authority, no one tried to support them. The relief report was completed by the competent authority through a countersign until the year 2000 and 2001. Applicant's performance review reports for, were not completed, their overall score could not be worked out properly according to the Promotion Policy Petitioner, in the circumstances, it was encountered. The relevant High Court officials have already refused to intervene in the matter, however, the applicant's performance test reports for the years 2000 and 2001 are completed within a stipulated period and subsequently filed before the Central Selection Board. The matter was directed to be kept. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n power of attorney advocate Rabwah lawyer