Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO.46/IB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 24TH MAY, 2004. versus I.T.A. NO.46/IB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 24TH MAY, 2004.

Sections 120, 121, 130 (8) and 131 Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal Income Tax Officer, although not obligated to accept the sales tax record, but since the present taxation system was in the process of development in the same manner as Since the department was known for accepting what Assisi declared as correct income, reports prepared by other government agencies said the background could not be thrown away immediately. Estimated sales tax audit party report was not a substitute for sales tax department, was equal in status and qualifications. The Department of Income Tax cannot be praised for its ignorance by the Assisting Officer in the Income Tax proceeding without any concrete evidence, one should respect the statement of the supporters through another agency which is the same. Responsible and respectful because everyone should play their role in creating a new one. Success in improving the tax system in the country, even the diagnostic officer should come up with a practical approach. CH does not mean that taxpayers should be left with no difference, but matters should now be improved and the department should be able to improve these people. To collect evidence against, it has to use its own limits, which were using the facilities that were brought to accelerate the progressive taxation system in the country. The confidence of taxpayers should be realized by accepting income as they have been declared, but on the basis of direct evidence the success of the country's mutual respect, harmony, progressive tax system and its Given the spirit of elimination. Tax d immigration advocate from Dadu lawyer