LIAQAT versus STATE
Section 2?2 (b) and 7337a (iv) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), there was no contradictory contradiction or lacuna in the evidence of the prosecution which shows that the incident did not take place in this manner As described. The presence of eyewitnesses was rather natural in the presence of eyewitnesses. Ocular testimony impressed confidence All reports of a ballistic expert were fired from the same firearm, it was not enough to exclude the evidence of natural and independent witnesses No enmity with the accused in the absence of weakness of the motive There was no valid basis for relying on ocular evidence to confirm the existence of a free and reliable motivational ocular account was verified by medical evidence and refused to allow an appeal to recover the weapons of crime. had gone
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Sohawa District Daska lawyer