Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MATIN versus MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ

The testimony of the Section 302 evidence, not only the eye witness, who was the natural witness of the incident, testified and affirmed the incident, but also strongly opposed the full examination of the cross examination, without delay. An FIR was filed immediately which could not be charged. The eye witnesses, although closely related to the detainee, did not read any misunderstanding or evidence or review any dispute between the ocular account and the medical evidence, and could not be considered an interesting witness simply because of the relationship. There was no basis for excluding his evidence. , When they said that the witnesses were natural witnesses, medical evidence fully established that the victim's death was caused by fireworks wounds, found on her dead body and the time of her death. Was prolonged and a strong motive was laid against the accused. The accused's alleged behavior after satisfactorily explaining any convincing and plausible explanation for which the accused had been absconding for more than six years, indicated his guilt when considering chance and objective evidence together. When spot inspection was done, the recovered 7 62 bore was also a piece of evidence that could be used to contact the accused. The criminal prosecution successfully established a charge of murder against the accused, he was truly convicted and sentenced, the trial court's decision in the cases could not be interfered with. top advocate from Rawat lawyer