HUSSAIN ALI versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF ALI
Section 12 Law In this testimony (10 of 1984), the Article 79 suit for the specific performance of the contract filed a specific performance of the contract against the legal heritage because the owner had died, the 415th legatee acknowledged. A written statement was filed, the trial court dismissed the trial. The agreement to sell this contract was unapproved. The appellate court ruled in this case, and a witness was presented to prove the execution. The importance of the two witnesses' testimony in the contract execution case was lost as the co-owners of the 4/5 shares filed several times over the controversial written statement that they were paid in lieu of that amount. Had to pay time. Such material was not contradictory and the definition of evidence was not appropriate by the appellate court. The appellate court has not ruled out any illegal proceedings or irregularities, and a large and revision plea that was upheld by its decision was dismissed under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Pindi bhohri lawyer