NAZIR AHMAD versus SHER MUHAMMAD
Article 2 (5) of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), the specific performance of the section 12 contract recovery contract was not a freely misleading property nor did it prove that the documents were misrepresented or repressed by its free will. Without the proof of the bargaining / agreement between the parties, there would hardly be any legal basis for the preparation of two minor testimonies of an agreement, the approval of the injunction for special performance. The parties were already under litigation and it is unreliable that they entered into a sale transaction without resolving other disputes.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer