Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus SH. WAMIQ SOHAIL


OI, Rr 3, 10 and Section 115 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Article 42 The adjudicatory findings against the deceased person were challenged by the defendants through a decision and decree declared by the civil court that the defendant was deceased. The person had filed a lawsuit, so the order could not be passed against the deceased person. The plaintiff had also claimed ownership through inheritance and the defendant had requested the boundary of the case and refused. Whether the suit had been proved by the trial court from time to time with the correctness of the documents and oral evidence that the defendant had filed the case. The deceased person, who was a tenant appeals court, examined all the material available on the record, found no illegal or improper in the verdict No false statements or evidence were not read to indicate the circumstances of the request for review. I was excluded

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from FR Kohat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.