GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus SH. WAMIQ SOHAIL
OI, Rr 3, 10 and Section 115 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Article 42 The adjudicatory findings against the deceased person were challenged by the defendants through a decision and decree declared by the civil court that the defendant was deceased. The person had filed a lawsuit, so the order could not be passed against the deceased person. The plaintiff had also claimed ownership through inheritance and the defendant had requested the boundary of the case and refused. Whether the suit had been proved by the trial court from time to time with the correctness of the documents and oral evidence that the defendant had filed the case. The deceased person, who was a tenant appeals court, examined all the material available on the record, found no illegal or improper in the verdict No false statements or evidence were not read to indicate the circumstances of the request for review. I was excluded
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from FR Kohat lawyer