MUHAMMAD AZEEM versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL
A VI, R 2 and Section 115 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), not sued for prosecution under section 8 suit cases The suit was filed by the trial court for ownership against the plaintiff and such decisions were made. And the order was appealed against. Was dismissed by the appellate court. The plaintiff did not accept that the petition was entered into his possession by a contract of sale, and the second petition that he was a joint owner was not taken down. I have made a controversial decision against the plaintiff's decision in the controversial matter. And because of the appreciation of the law and the facts, the orders were passed which demanded that the High Court not interfere with the process of jurisdiction under section 115, the CPC petition was dismissed in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Khanpur lawyer
