Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAMAL versus MST. GULSHAN AFROZ

Section 12 (2) and OVII, R 11 appeal only to challenge the validity of the orders for fraud, misrepresentation or withdrawal of jurisdiction in the plea hearing and the order denying the order verification. 2) As may be challenged, in the present case the CPC's plea of fraud, misrepresentation or want of jurisdiction, even though allegations of fraud and misrepresentation were made, it was stated that the petitioner's counsel An unclean order was obtained from the collateral, but this section was not pressurized, under which the words used in the provisions of section 12 (2) Want more options. , CPC means that the applicant's hereditary reduction of the jurisdiction did not even confirm the applicability of the application under OVII, R 11, CPC and the hereditary will of the jurisdiction and the court ruled that First decide it, it will not remove the jurisdiction itself. The jurisdiction of the court which owns the case cannot be affected by the jurisdictional scheme. OA VII, R 11, Approval of the agreement on the occasion of application under CPC was not, in the circumstances, without jurisdiction registration advocate from Gujar Khan lawyer