Find a Lawyer

MANZOOR BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

Defendants affected by the prejudice litigation for the declaration of prejudice caused by the non-preparation of the suit case for Section 42 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), R-XIV, R1 Acknowledged that the claimant had nothing to do with the last male holder. The trial court did not establish a relationship issue, although it was the responsibility of the court to set up the appropriate cases, but the parties did not relinquish their responsibility to claim the appropriate cases at the appropriate stage, which was tabled in the plaintiff. The table was not specifically denied which the plaintiff presented. Evidence in support of their relationship was not examined by any witnesses as the matter was not constituted before the appellate court, there was no complaint filed in the review petition. The relationship with the last male holder was not disputed, the name of one of the claimants was not in the genealogy table, the claimant withdrew his pledge, but on the question of the relationship he was not examined for any of the particular issues. The result was not, the dispute was hidden from another issue law firms from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer