MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus ABDUL RAUF
Article 55 Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Section 12 Contract Specific Performance The time of the contract assumption The plaintiff filed a lawsuit for the specific performance of the contract of sale only that the defendant was obliged to pay the balance in time or Failed to tender. Trial Appellate Court dismissed the trial and dismissed their decision, and the only reason given by the appellate court for dismissing the case was because it was the essence of the agreement and the plaintiff was required to pay the balance. I was unsuccessful as the date of the agreement was not in accordance with the appellate court's observed record. The general rule was that in the case of contracts for sale of immovable property, there was usually no evidence that the evidence was on record Was ready and willing to play a part. The contract and he filed the lawsuit immediately; no evidence was available to refute the evidence presented by the plaintiff. The legal order was set aside in the case of non-recording and trial. The court order was restored
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Lasbela lawyer