TARIQ MAHMOOD versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 320, 322 and 279 bail, further inquiry section 320, grant of PPC under which the challan was presented in court, is guaranteed. But there was no sentence punishable by imprisonment other than the payment of the debt, but it was not yet decided whether the payment of the monetary sum would bring the case of the accused under the prohibited clause of section 497 (1). For the CCP complainant as well as the lawyer, the state failed to state whether the payment of the dues was related to a sentence of more than seven years imprisonment or the case was brought under the prohibition clause of section 749 prohibition. Yes, CCP Bell was allowed to be accused, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Pasni lawyer