Find a Lawyer

MANI LAL versus STATE

Further investigation against the accused, in section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), sections 381A, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 34, alleges that he had committed car theft in questioning and Did you register it in your entry? Counterfeit documents alleging that the car was sold to the owner by a document / statement that was considered to have been borrowed from the suspect, the document confirms. The two witnesses, along with the eight commissioners, also testified that the State Counsel confirmed that the documents were presented to the investigating officer in order to justify the involvement of the accused in the alleged crime, the responsibility of the investigating agency. It is advisable to send the handwriting expert along with the vehicle owner's signed signatures to this document. So in the absence of an expert opinion, it was initially a matter of further investigation but it has not yet been proved that the documents were genuine or that the police officer's opinion was not binding on any court, but It cannot be ignored at all, at least at the bail stage, the accused was in custody for more than six months and did not appear at the conclusion of the investigation. Required for Investigation The case is eligible for bail approval, the accused admitted to bail \ r \ n \ r \ n online advocate from Manoabad lawyer