MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE
Section 498 Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance (11 of 1971), Section 21 (1) (a) Guarantee prior to arrest, the accused's grant did not provide pesticide to the complainant, but the complainant did not have any misunderstanding or misunderstanding Was supplied to the complainant under cultivation instead of pesticides, which caused the complainant's crops, no mans ra was charged with the accused Prima Fiki, the accused did not commit any crime. , The investigating officer had to find out that the pesticide supplied to the complainant was neither mixed nor poor quality records suggest that it could not be resolved in this case. Whether or not the accused or his employee was at fault, the suspect was recently granted bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Mirpur Khas lawyer