Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMAD PANHWAR versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Section 2 (b) restates the services of a person working in Sindh Government Employees (Appointment, Development and Exchange) Rules, 1974, R7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) BS17. had gone. The corporation's BS-19 was ordered to affect the sentiment against this post and the person assumed responsibility in BS 19, however, was canceled and sent back to the parent department. The department was in the process of being dispersed as it was absorbed into another sector in the BS17 notification by which its sentiment was canceled and sent back to the home department. He was arrested by the employee through a departmental appeal that was not decided within 90 days, therefore, he had earlier filed an appeal by the service tribunal which rejected the valid material on record. On which it was ordered to absorb was a cadre post and could not be filled by non-CCA. Dear Officer means only one officer under regular service and who was a civil servant, as defined in the Sindh Civil Servants Act 1973 and the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules 1974, It can be deployed in BS 19 that its absorption order was in violation of the rules and it could not be accepted as an employee's correct and proper order that its absorption order was executed in BS 19. Was given, then he was given the right to a right. At this point, in view of the principle of locus punicata, there was misunderstanding, for leave to appeal against the order of the service tribunal. immigration advocate from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer