Find a Lawyer

MALIK MUHAMMAD ALI versus STATE

Section 561A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 379, 468, 471, 420 and 406 Police Rules, 1934, Volume III, Chap 25, R 25 56 were presented by the Investigation Officer in the order reduction case and The applicant had also directed the relevant Section H to proceed in connection with the investigation of the matter and to take action under Chap 25 KR 25 56, Volume III of Police Rules 193, the petitioner had requested. It has also been alleged that an unclean order was passed behind his bricks in violation of the principles of natural justice and fair play, and that an unknown order was passed on the wrong premises of the law and involved in the case. The order was passed only nine years after the fact was registered that the matter was investigated by the investigating agency and tried to cancel it, a cancellation report was prepared which was agreed by the magistrate through the controversial order. The comment was made that the accused did not produce a fake document. The magistrate approved the speaking order. A request that did not require a request for intervention without any substance was excluded family advocate from Bhakkar lawyer