Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD JUMAN versus STATE


Sections 182 and 211 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Section 439 were convicted and sentenced under Section 182, PPC, for false information and false accusation, but from initiating proceedings against it. Prior to this, neither the show notice was issued nor any explanation was sought from him which was a necessary requirement. Apart from this, the trial court acquitted the accused in the direct complaint filed by the petitioner. The suspect had taken advantage of the suspect, but did not complain that the complaint was declared a false crime and was rejected by two courts. Who was punished. The decisions of the two courts involved in the ratification request were set aside and they were acquitted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Dijkot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.