Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) Appreciating the Evidence Both the complainant and the prosecution's other witness were real brothers and the victim's son was his own version of the prosecution, showing that the incident occurred in the dark hours of the cold night when the atmosphere faded. Had happened, it had not happened in the circumstances. At the place where the prosecution witnesses were present as usual for the events, during the cross-examination, the prosecutor's witness rectified that he had a torch and was identified in the light of the attackers, but they were investigated by the investigating officer. Such a torch was never presented before. During the investigation, the identity of the assailants during the dark night, when there was no moon in the sky and the attackers were at a distance of 10/15 kr. According to the complainant's own version, there was no evidence on record that both of the prosecution Were witnesses. The relative was not present on the spot at the time, and was murdered by someone outside Bhani o during the odd hours of the night, after finding the complainant and the body lying there, a false story was prepared and the accused along with the others. Due to the suspicion, the conduct of the investigating officer during the investigation did not appear to have been suspected. The incident on the prosecution's story was a blind murder and it cannot be said precisely that after the preliminary investigation, the case was registered after the trial and the close relation of the victim as a witness. The stakeholders were also presented. Those who were considered interesting witnesses in the facts and circumstances of the case and their oral statements could not be relied on unless they were found guilty of the crime. jobs for advocates from Nowshero Feroz lawyer