Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION AND OTHERS versus MUHAMMAD TAYYAB

Section 7 (3) (a) (b) Federal Public Service Commission's Competitive Exam Rules, 2002, Para II Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 240, 275 ((1), 199 and 185 (3) From 2% to one seat for the Civil Superior Service Examination for Kamdesh Azad Jammu and Kashmir, only the Federal Public Service Commission approved a leave of appeal through a press note to consider these questions as to the jurisdiction of the Constitution. What can be done under 199? The constitution that was granted as a High Court has to be requested in view of the alternatives considered under Sections 7 (3) (a) and (b) of the Federal Public Service Commission Ordinance, 1977. Can go Regardless of the rules contained in the rules, there was a misappropriation and misrepresentation of 2% quota for Independent Jammu and Kashmir Rules 7 and 11 of the Competitive Examinations, whether on the order approved in the writ petition. If implemented, there is no real way as to which accommodation is provided to the candidate and due to such accommodation the defendant cannot miss last year's vacant / available seat while A / C of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Compared to the quota. Whether the latest and appropriate records are prepared in accordance with the laws of all Friday and minus fraction details, whether the available positions are transparently followed by strict adherence to the allocation quota or And. Whether the provisions contained in Article 240 read with Article 275 (1) of the Constitution were strictly complied with, or in any other way, that provided for the appointments and service of persons in the service of Pakistan. Services of Pakistan Federation, Federation of Affairs and All Paks top advocate from Gujranwala lawyer