Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUMTAZ BAGUM versus BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB


Section 164 of the Civil Code (v. 1908), Section 141 of the General Clause Act (X9 of 1897), Section 24A of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Petition Board of Revenue, for non-compliance with these orders. Deletes an application in which the applicant has rejected the applicant. Her father was asked to submit a process fee. The Board of Revenue did not mention the reason for the dismissal order, applying the CPC principles to the Board of Revenue under Section 141, CPC. Pending. It was not in accordance with the law passed by the Member Board of Revenue as public officials were bound and it was held that the High Court had passed the order of the Member Board of Revenue after applying the mind to the dispute between the parties. Observed that the decision upon review would be deemed to have been postponed. \ R \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Washuk lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.