Find a Lawyer

MALIK BASHIR AHMAD versus NAVEED AAMER RAJA

Sections 12 and 55 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O xxxxx, Rr 1 & 2 suit defendant's failure to comply with the sale deed for specific performance and permanent injunction, the trial court granted the defendant The ad interim relief was ordered and directed to submit a bank guarantee within 15 days of the approval of this order and the defendants were barred from selling / changing the nature of the suit property with the question mark if the plaintiff was within a specified time. If the bank fails to offer a guarantee then the order will be requested for a stay. It is held that the weld notes contained in the sale agreement were not allowed to sell the property to any third party, so the status of the said note could not be decided without recording the evidence of the parties to the trial court. Instead of providing a bank guarantee, the bank would show its dishonesty for the amount that was not accepted for the deposit. y The defendants, which were based on equity because it had accepted the first appeal from the trial court order to avoid the majority of litigation to protect the interests of the parties, with the modification that the plaintiff's Instead of offering a source bank guarantee, he was directed to submit the amount to the trial court within fifteen days by the order of the High Court of Trial - the amount would be immediately deposited and deposited in a national lucrative scheme. The final distribution of the benefits will be regulated by order. According to the decision of the Central Suit Party, the court, which has succeeded, will be entitled to the said amount along with the profit / f. online advocate from Vehari lawyer