SHABBIR AHMAD versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHIEF MANAGER
The suits Articles 9 and 22 claimed to have assessed the value of the hypothecated goods by the Banking Court Appellant for the recovery of the money, saying that the exact value of the hypothecated goods specified by the Banking Court was not supported by the local commissioner's report and The Banking Court should authorize the bank itself to list the impugned goods, but after this, the record is being misinterpreted and the matter has been demanded to be reconsidered, agreeing with the appellant's argument. The High Court, the banking judge, directed the matter to be determined and the matter was forwarded. In light of the record and the alternative bank was instructed to move the goods so that there was no impediment in carrying out the orders through the process of execution. The Banking Court allowed a period of one month for the purposes of determining the issue. And until then the execution of the death sentence against the appellant will be stopped. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Tall lawyer
