Find a Lawyer

DR. GHULAM MUSTAFA SOLANGI versus STATE

Articles 11 and 16 against the Property (Enforcement Jewish) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (3) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Article 555 were entered into by the husband and wife, current proceedings. I cannot give her legal status - the legality or validity of the marriage contract could only be challenged if the defendant had not disclosed a civil court to the competent spouse. The exact address of the parties or that the marriage column was empty which required the disclosure of the marital status of the husband, the challan was unlawfully presented to the magistrate under the signature of unauthorized police officers, apparently deputy. Under the influence of the District Attorney, which had no legal value, and its acceptance by the magistrate could not express the natural defect of the accused's wife. The court and her spouse had lied to the prosecutor's story as described in the FIR and could not be believed that he was allegedly married to his wife legally. The case against the accused who was the case, even the investigating officer's report cannot be falsely registered, even if all the evidence is on record, the complainant will still be present at the trial. Trial proceedings stopped before trial by FIR filed by source under circumstances r \ n \ r \ n immigration advocate from Mustang lawyer