MUHAMMAD LATIF versus ASSISTANT MANAGER/SUB?DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OPERATION SUB-DIVISION LESCO (WAPDA)
The Section 24 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), the Section 3 intra-court appellant, alleged that its power connection was disconnected and attempted without prior notice, although it did not know. An imposition bill was issued and it was not stated that there was no reduction. The High Court informed them that there was no comment on the truth of the allegations made in the appeal, but the Appellant was directed to appear before the Authority along with a copy of the appeal which was requested / represented by the Authority. And will be decided within a week. In the meantime, the Appellant is subject to submission charges and any other legal obligations under which the authorities may notify the Appellant, the electrical contact of the Appellant will be restored within a specified time. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Issa Khel lawyer
